Nevzat Ertan, Chief Architect & Global Manager for Digital Machining architecture at Sandvik Coromant, explains the misconceptions and barriers of Edge computing for manufacturers – and argues the case for embracing the Edge.
Defining the ‘Edge’
First, let’s start by defining Edge computing. Edge computing and Edge analytics describe the data capture, processing and analysis that take place on a device – on the ‘edge‘ of the process – in real time.
Unlike traditional methods, which typically collate data from several machines at a centralised store, Edge computing is a form of distributed computing that brings the computation and data storage of one or more machines closer to the given sources of data. The process can improve response times and save bandwidth.
In an industrial environment, conducting analytics at an individual device can provide significant cost and resource savings compared to data processing using a purely Cloud-based method. For clarity, this Cloud-based, method refers to streaming data from multiple devices to one centralised store and conducting data analysis there.
Drowning in data
Using the centralised method, huge volumes of data must be collected and transferred to one place before they can be analysed. While there are advantages to having every piece of machinery data in a central hub, it can be painfully difficult to manage. This complexity will be heightened in facilities with a large number of machines, especially if the communication protocols differ on each device. And unfortunately, not all data speaks the same language.
This method can also create a massive glut of operational data – and weeding out insightful knowledge from the monotonous can be a painstaking task. Let’s face it: spotting inaccuracies in the metal cutting process of a large and expensive part is crucial knowledge, but the energy efficiency of a small conveyor at the end of the process, for instance, isn’t quite as valuable.
With Edge computing, operators can instead set parameters to decide which data is worth storing (either in the Cloud or in an on-site server) – and which isn’t.
To be clear, though, Edge computing is not an alternative to Cloud-based methods, or an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) process in which Cloud-based technology and Edge computing can work together. These technologies are not competing against each other. In fact, each entity is making the other’s job easier. The computing environments associated with IIoT take a variety of forms, from an industrial PC remote server to a gateway or back-office infrastructure.
These tools are essential to support edge computing because they are distributed away from the core, or the cloud. They have the capacity to perform a variety of tasks – particularly tasks that don’t necessitate analytics at the Edge.
The benefit of this combined model is that it allows enterprises to have the best of both worlds: a reduction in latency by making decisions based on Edge analytics for some devices, while also collating the data in a centralised source. The model also allows future analysis of data and other processes, as well as the capturing of data required for regulatory reasons.
Edge computing in practice
As with so many other industrial innovations, there are people who perceive Edge computing as daunting, unobtainable, or simply out-of-reach. However, that couldn’t be further from the truth. The primary benefit of Edge analytics is its scalability. Pushing analytics to sensors and network devices can significantly reduce the strain on enterprise data management (or EDM) and analytics systems. Plus, there’s the opportunity to start small.
Unlike the smart factory concepts hailed in the early 2010s, deploying Edge computing does not require an entire systems overhaul or investment in several machines. Instead, manufacturers can opt for just one device that provides analytics at the edge.
For instance, with Sandvik Coromant’s CoroPlus Edge computing offering, intelligent tools and sensors can be deployed on one piece of equipment. This has proven especially beneficial in the boring of large components, for example, where one small mistake can be incredibly costly.
To avoid mistakes, the newly-launched machine integrated version of Sandvik Coromant’s Silent Tools. Plus, with CoroPlus Connected, uses data generated at the cutting zone to identify potential problems. Automated cutting actions can then be applied to avoid any costly mistakes.
Overcoming barriers
As with all industrial technologies, there are security concerns about that must be taken into consideration. In fact, according to a Kollective report, 66% of IT teams view the architecture as a genuine threat to their organisation. The primary reason for this concern? Apprehension about Edge security.
Naturally, the distributed nature of Edge computing does require some changes to security methods – especially if the facility in question has relied previously on a traditional centralised or Cloud-based infrastructure. With Edge computing, data instead travels between different distributed nodes, which may require special encryption mechanisms that are independent of the Cloud.
On the other hand, processing data at the Edge minimises the transmission of sensitive information to the Cloud. Some could argue this is more secure, but, in reality, it depends on the given security protocols.
That being said, malicious, routing information and DDoS (distributed denial of service) attacks are still possible – as they are with any Internet-enabled device. The first and most important step is to seek confidence and reassurance from the manufacturer of your Edge device.
At Sandvik Coromant, for instance, we’ve designed a new security principal to give our customers peace of mind. It’s been developed to support the ANSI/ISA-95 standard, which applies internationally and is from the International Society of Automation for developing automated interfaces between enterprise and control systems.
Better understanding
Edge computing is widely hailed as a groundbreaking technology in the industrial realm, and wider IT applications. However, there are multiple misconceptions that must be dispelled before Edge systems are deployed in industrial settings.
First, the technology doesn’t replace IIoT, nor does it compete with other Cloud-based analytics methods. In fact, the technologies must work harmoniously for manufacturers to reap the true benefits of edge computing. Similarly, the technology doesn’t pose any greater security risk than existing Internet-enabled data collection methods. Security protocols may simply need to be updated.
It’s clear that Edge computing can provide significant benefits to manufacturers. They include a reduction in the latency involved in decision making, the optimisation of Cloud-based data collection, and a decrease in the energy required to consistently stream data from every device in a facility to a centralised hub.
What’s more, deploying Edge computing is more straightforward than many believe. Manufacturers don’t need to overhaul entire systems to reap the benefits of the Edge. The proper deployment of Edge nodes can provide several benefits including reduced latency for real-time applications, more efficient use of bandwidth and storage resources, enhanced scalability, reduced energy costs, improved environmental performance, as well as better opportunities for privacy control and data protection.
As Google Trends data shows, general interest in Edge computing is growing. But, as is always the case, manufacturers must fully understand its potential before they invest.
Check out more Edge content on our Industrial page.
Plus, IoT Insider’s sister publication Electronic Specifier has more on communications tech at its Wireless page. Plus, you can also comment below, or delve deeper at our LinkedIn page.
